View Single Post
  #3  
Old May 23rd, 2017, 08:47 AM
BobBray BobBray is offline
-= Dues Paid =-
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Truck: 1967 CM 2500
Posts: 299
Thanks: 18
Thanked 41 Times in 19 Posts
Rep Power: 172
BobBray will become famous soon enoughBobBray will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Toro-Flow- G.M. vs. Cummins

It is a strange reference in that the 348/409 were gasoline engines, and the dispute was more to do with oversquare diesel engines. Oversquare really doesn't work too well for diesels, as you stated it's difficult to build compression (vitally important for a diesel!) and I question if it puts undue stress on the crank and rods compared to undersquare diesels. In any event, there have been very few oversquare diesels.

You know, back around 1980 when Detroit Diesel introduced the 8.2L 'Fuel Squeezer', I initially thought it was some sort of a revised Toro-Flow!
Reply With Quote