![]() |
1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
Hello to all.
I am interested in knowing the suspension differences on 1960 to 1966 GMC trucks. 1. what are the differences in 1/2 ton vs 3/4 ton truck suspensions. 2. What are the differences in early 60's vs the later years to 1966.( assuming they made changes? and if so what year.) 3. How do the differences effect the ride comfort and handling. Thank you in advance for your reply. Fritz |
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
Fritz, there is basic information here;
http://6066gmcguy.com/GMCID2.html My 61 with the torsion bars rides nice and smooth. I'd like to add a front anti-sway bar in the future as I've read that helps. |
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
Hello Mr, Funky,
Thank you for the link apparently for the site. next time I should look around a bit before I post a question. That explains things. Do you own a coil spring truck? and if so is there an appreciable difference in ride and load handling abilities? love the 60 and 61 hoods! Funky indeed! Fritz |
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
Fritz, I own several 1960-62 torsion bar equipped trucks and a similar number of 63-66 coil spring trucks. When I drive the heavier 60-62 torsion bar equipped trucks, the ride feels significantly smoother and to me I feel as if these trucks must also have a lower center of gravity, because the cornering is improved at higher speeds and body roll is far less than on a 63-66. the 60-62 trucks seem to give me less bounce and jarring inside the cab from running across things like potholes and railroad tracks. The 60-62 seats in deluxe models have a Wood bottom w/ thicker foam than spring + thinner foam on custom cab seats after 1962 so the ride comfort is improved even more when you have the special wood bottomed seat. To prevent body roll and increase front end stability, an optional front sway bar was offered in 63-66 to compensate for the loss in steering stability from giving up the torsion bar front end. These can be found from time to time and added to any 63-66 truck if you buy one.
|
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
Thank you MR. Nut,
That is the information based on experience I was looking for. It seems to me that the torsion bar suspension would be a more controlled ride and offer better roll stability. Do you have a photo link showing your trucks? Thank you for your reply, Fritz |
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
:upyes:Morning Fritz;
I used to have a pair of 70 and 73 GMC's. Those were coil sprung 3/4 ton trucks and rode just fine. I never really hauled too much except band PA equipment. The ride on the torsion suspension does feel different and unique from the coils; sorta car-like and almost floaty( but not bouncy), if that makes sense. Yeah I've come to really like that husky hood :bump5: Henry |
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
5 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
5 Attachment(s)
couple more of the 66 GMC Suburban - it has literally every factory and dealer add-on option you could get in 66. Engine is the optional 351 Magnum w/ factory assembly line installed and working AC, PB, PS, all three rows of seats, clamshells, radio, 2 speed wiper and washers, sway bar, you name it - its got it.
|
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
I've got a 61 1500 series step-side with a nice long tray on it. As far as general handling goes, despite the lack of power steering and power brakes (I'm still running on 4 drums as well) I really can't complain. The old man corners much better than I would've thought. Admittedly, if I'm in a situation where I've got to go full lock on the steering wheel (like a the end of a cul-de-sac for example) you can tell he doesn't like it all that much. Obviously parking lots with their modern day postage stamp sized spaces pose an issue from time to time. But again, you sort-of know going into it that you're not going to get the handling of a modern vehicle. I think that's part of the charm.
I have found it to be a bit light in the rear though. So I tend to drive accordingly when it comes to driving over manhole covers and what not. Having said that, I'm not carrying any weight. So I reckon it wouldn't be as much of an issue if he did a bit more work. The 'floaty' description that someone gave is pretty apt for mine as well. Not so much over bumps and such (because of the empty tray) but more so in that once I start approaching highway speed everything lightens up a bit. Not in a dangerous way. Just enough to remind you to pay attention to what's going on. Sorry for the long-winded answer. I do tend to go on a bit LOL |
Re: 1960/1961 Suspension VS later years
Thank you J.M. I appreciate the anecdotal description and I understand perfectly well. It almost seems to me that front coil on later models was done for manufacturing economies over the torsion bar suspension.
Fritz |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.