![]() |
Re: 305E Intake mod.
Quote:
|
Re: 305E Intake mod.
Ah ok, That's a big gap! I think mine are at .040 or .045. Just pulled some plugs again after hauling a couple heavy loads of lumber....load on truck and load on trailer....plugs are still looking new. :thumbsup: Did notice some carbon build up on one around the ridge....but nothing to be concerned about. I'll post some pictures of the load in my build thread. I was joking about a 750. haha The 600 is plenty for that motor, not enough RPM to justify the air....but those jugs sure draw some vacuum!
|
Re: 305E Intake mod.
600CFM definitely sounds good for the 305, is there a noticeable increase in acceleration when the secondaries kick in? When I was 17 years old I tried a Holley 780 dual feed carb on the 68 with that same adapter you first used, vacuum leaks, fluctuating idle and excessive gas consumption:ahhhh:. No way would it work so back went on the Holley 500 2bbl:lolsmack2:
|
Re: 305E Intake mod.
1 Attachment(s)
You can feel them kick in I know that. lol Mainly depends on RPM....I'll gun it from 2000 to 3000 and that's about it. But it pulls much better now that the manifold is open! Here's a picture of the load in tow this morning. lol Unloaded those by hand......
|
Re: 305E Intake mod.
Wow... quite the load there TJ!
I'd like to toy with the idea of adding a SMALL 4 bbl carb (Carter AFB or maybe Rochester Quadrajet, maybe Holley Street Avenger) to the 351, but on a 351, 600 cfm would really be the useable limit. These engines were intended for low rpm, they have no harmonic balancer even. Doing mods than are only beneficial at 4000+ rpm will tear up these engines. I think a 351 may be able to get even better fuel mileage if I were to run a small 4 bbl on it. 600 cfm on a 305 is just overkill. You'd likely get better low end response with a smaller carb. Having your cam reground to add about .020" lift and running custom higher compression pistons to be able to run magnum heads on a 305 (otherwise the big chambers will drop your cr below useable), that would require a little more carburetion, and make great power. The thing that always gets me in the hot rod automobile community vs vintage motorcycle community, is that the bigger automotive engines mask mixture issues more than a smaller bike engine, so people never bother changing out carb jetting to fine tune the engines! I have a wide and o2 sensor and AFR gauge/controller tailpipe sniffer setup nowadays. I have yet to put it on the GMC, but will when I run the 351C with the Holley 500 conversion. I hope to add an X pipe to the exhaust at some point, and maybe get some custom headers made. Dual exhaust is overrated, that's why H pipes became common and now the superior X pipe dual setup is popular. Same reason everyone started making 4 into 1 headers for 4 cylinder race bikes following Pops Yoshimura's lead... |
Re: 305E Intake mod.
Quote:
|
Re: 305E Intake mod.
Can this mod be completed on a 1960 single barrel intake?
|
Re: 305E Intake mod.
Quote:
|
Re: 305E Intake mod.
Thx, I have an extra 2 barrel and can do the mod on that. I guess the old 1 barrel is paperweight material now.
|
Re: 305E Intake mod.
1 Attachment(s)
The 1bbl manifold does not have a big enough plenum to accept any kind pf modifications. The best is the 66 and up Magnum manifold used on 351E,M,401M, 432 and 478M engines because theses particular manifolds have a 4bbl plenum that just needs to be opened up.:thumbsup:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.