![]() |
Re: New guy
Quote:
|
Re: New guy
Quote:
Welcome to the site, Hubarlow: First thing I noticed about your post was the response your get about the V6, ----"THERE AIN'T NO SUCH A THING". I get a kick out of the responses I get when I talk about the V12s. Isn't it fun to have one, and educate some people about a great piece of automotive history? Some who have seen it the first time and scratching their heads, I add that it was a factory option back in those days. That's when I get the big "deer in the headlights look". I'll finally confess that I fibbed a little. Enjoy your toy, and keep us posted on your progress. |
Re: New guy
I am also looking for another hood for the truck. From what I have seen, a 61-64 hood will work. Maybe something from an old school bus or something. If anyone knows of one, I would be grateful to hear of it.
Actually any 60-66 GMC hood will work but you don't want:pullinghairout: a 60-61 style hood:ahhhh: on your 63. Stick with the 62-66 style hood:thumbsup: |
Re: New guy
Quote:
|
Re: New guy
Welcome aboard!
|
Re: New guy
"1964 GMC 1500 305E/sm420 4 barrel intake mod and dual exhaust." Did I read that right? You found a 4 barrel intake for the 305? Where? Watched one of the videos with the GMC. You drive it like I drive mine. Every day.
|
Re: New guy
Quote:
|
Re: New guy
Quote:
I put another V12 on a '72 Ford long wheel base 1 ton, but used a '62 GMC cab and front clip with a flat bed. Gave it to a museum. It has the same tranny/V12 combo. I found the easiest way to get it all mounted was strip the frame, then started at the front, mounted motor and tranny with new mounts, then added cab and all after that. V6/12s are a fun world to play in. I always wondered why GMC quit them except maybe the couldn't sell enough parts since they hardly ever broke down, and fuel consumption was another mark against them. I'll be watching your progress and see where it leads you. Have fun. |
Re: New guy
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: New guy
V6/12s are a fun world to play in. I always wondered why GMC quit them except maybe the couldn't sell enough parts since they hardly ever broke down, and fuel consumption was another mark against them.
I could never really get a legitimate answer from anyone why GMC stopped producing the V6 as well as the 60 degree family of engines. I watched that period of time closely back around 74 and it appeared to be some sort of planned obsolescence that was from the hierarchy of GM and not the GMC Truck & Coach division. GMC Medium Duty Truck Brochures in 1974 did not list any of the GMC V6 or Turbium 478 Diesels, you could not find H, J or T 7500 series brochures at the dealers which were models that were exclusively powered by the V6. Yet when you would go to the dealer all these trucks in 74 still had the V6. To me I saw the trend of everything going to Chevrolet powerplants around that time as a reason of cutting production costs since Chevrolet engines were a lot cheaper:pullinghairout: to make than the big V6's. I think even GMC historian Don Meyer brought that up too. When you really think about that it makes sense because the GMC Truck and Coach division never had produced an engine of their own from that point, their engine plant ceased operations in Pontiac Michigan:banghead: |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.